More Generational Theft: Senate Democrats' "Stimulus" Loaded with Excess Spending, Too


Washington, Feb 3 - House Republicans and 11 House Democrats voted “no” on the trillion-dollar “stimulus” bill written by House Democratic leaders, on the grounds it is packed with hundreds of billions in spending unrelated to job creation and economic growth, borrowed from America’s children and grandchildren.  And despite declining public support for the proposed legislation, the Senate version of the bill is also loaded with billions in deficit spending that won’t create jobs.


“Republicans agree action is needed to help our economy create jobs and get back on the path to recovery, but borrowing billions from our children and grandchildren and spending it on slow-moving government programs isn’t the answer,” said Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH).

 

Here are some of the spending items congressional Republicans have identified in the Senate version as unrelated to significant job creation:

- $20 million “for the removal of small- to medium-sized fish passage barriers.”

- $25 million to rehabilitate off-roading (ATV) trails

- $34 million to remodel the Department of Commerce headquarters

- $70 million to “Support Supercomputing Activities” for climate research

 

At the beginning of the year, President Obama made clear that the goal of this economic recovery process was a bipartisan bill focused on job creation.  But refurbished federal office space and fish passage barriers was probably not what he had in mind. 

 

House Republicans have a plan to let middle-class families, small businesses, job-seekers, and home-buyers keep more of what they earn to create 6.2 million new jobs – more than twice the jobs as the congressional Democrats’ plan – at half the cost.  Will congressional Democrats finally keep President Obama’s promise and work with House Republicans on a bipartisan plan to create more jobs without burying future generations under mountains more of debt?  Or will they continue to press for their massive plan in an act of generational theft?

Print version of this document